The Nature of  Work, its Rewards, and Success
Neither life nor labor in the pre-industrial world were as divided into separate stages as both are today. After the age of five, modern lives usually
			have three distinct periods:
		
			- Twelve years of schooling often followed
				by four or more years of college or vocational training;
 
			- Four
				decades or so spent working or pursuing a career; and finally
 
			- Retirement
				at about age 65 when one starts living on accumulated savings,
				a Social Security pension, and possibly a pension from his or her employer.  
 
		
 
Prior to the 19th Century, with few exceptions, people spent their whole lives working, the great majority as farmers. If they had schooling it
			consisted of a few weeks each winter (when there was less field work
			to be done) and lasted usually no more than eight years.  The young were
			taught the basics: how to write (penmanship), reading, and enough
			arithmetic to calculate wages and make change.
As they grew up, the children of working families
			were expected to help with chores suited to their strength—running errands,
			carrying water, bringing in firewood, tending younger brothers and
			sisters. Boys soon learned to milk cows, "slop" (feed) the pigs, clean stables, and chop wood. Girls helped their mothers cook, clean, sew, tend garden,
			bake bread, and the like.  Depending on size and strength, boys sometime
			in their ‘teens went to a job either because they wanted to; they thought
			it their duty; or they were pushed to it by their parents. If they were
			hard workers, thrifty, and perhaps lucky, they in time might acquire
			some land for a small farm of their own, or tools and skill in using
			them for some sort of shop or business.
Those less fortunate would work for others all of their working years.  Few
			if any workers retired.  That was a privilege of the wealthy and of successful
			professionals (lawyers, ministers, physicians).  Workers whose health
			failed and could no longer work became dependent on their children
			or went on “relief,” moving to a publicly supported “poor
			farm.”   These
			conditions were the same for all working families in most industries,
			not just iron workers.
 Boys who lived and worked
			on iron plantations usually began work in their mid teens. They
			had no vocational school or other preparation for any job. They frequently
			started by working as a helper to their father, an uncle or older brother.  These “helper” jobs
			were a sort of apprenticeship where they learned by watching and assisting.  In
			this way boys discovered which jobs they liked or disliked even as the ironmaster
			was noting those who looked promising for the more important and better paying
			jobs.  The ironmaster also decided which boys were unlikely to be good
			at anything but supplying an extra hand.  The wisest course for a young
			man was to learn something about several or even all of the various jobs on
			the iron plantation.  Persons able to do anything that needed doing usually
			were assured steady work, if not at the establishment where they started, then
			at another.
Daughters in working
			families learned to do all the things necessary for the feeding,
			clothing and care of their worker fathers and brothers and of younger children.Some
			found work at the ironmaster’s mansion doing the same kinds of “women’s
			work.”  Their chief goal (and that of their family) was that they
			marry well—preferably a good worker or better, a prosperous farmer.
Before long the young
			male worker would find a particular task or two that he preferred.  If
			the ironmaster or manager agreed, he would be allowed to help at the position
			he wanted and move to it full-time if he did well and was needed.  Some
			workers preferred a single task and became especially good at it.  Others
			found doing the same thing repeatedly boring and preferred to change from time
			to time.
If a worker was injured
			on the job and could not work for a while or permanently, he would
			have no income or company housing unless the ironmaster gave him charity.  Sometimes the
			master would pay for a doctor, or his fellow workers might go together to assist
			him.  If even the best worker’s health failed or he lived too long,
			he again ran the risk of having to live off charity.  No laws protected
			workers in their jobs—they could be fired anytime at the whim of their
			employer who told them what to do, paid them what he thought they were worth
			to him—unless a labor shortage obliged him to pay more.  When a worker
			could no longer perform duties to his employer’s satisfaction, he risked
			losing his job.
Some workers seemed to
			lack ambition.  However, it was often opportunities to move ahead that
			they lacked.  And so the great majority came to accept the reality of their
			situations, working hard when work was available, enjoying prosperity when it
			came, and suffering from poverty when work was scarce.  Satisfaction, of
			necessity, had to come from doing their jobs well, from their relationships
			with one another and their families.  It almost certainly could not come
			from the amassing of material possessions.
“Success” for most did not mean becoming
			wealthy—that was so rare as to be unrealistic.  To acquire a “competence,” a
			farm or a job that was sufficient to support one’s family in comfort,
			free of debt, was success for most working people.   If their farm
			was large and fertile, it would carry the workman and his wife until their deaths.  Usually
			the child who agreed to stay and manage his parents’ farm or business
			and live with and care for them in their declining years would inherit the property.  The
			custom that the family home would pass to the eldest son was accordingly weakened
			in practice. 
	Prof. Gerald Eggert
Penn State University