Image courtesy of Brian Genduso.


REFLECTION
 

It's over.

In developing a unique solution to the problem at hand I found that no matter how much work I though I had done, I had not done enough.  The design always has room for improvement, and if you truly care about your design, you will be constantly thinking about it, and how to improve it.   I finally found that the only way to complete thesis is to set goals for yourself and once they are achieved you just have to stop.

I found that no matter how much work I tried to get done early in the semester I still pulled 4 or 5 all-nighters.  Even with the warnings from thesis classes past, it is just too tempting to procrastinate.  Like a great poster on the wall in the thesis lab says, "Hard work often pays off over time, but laziness pays off right now."  I tried to avoid that mentality by doing work early in the semester, but as soon as I returned to campus after spring break, I realized just how much laid ahead of me.

In thesis, we have to prepare a "report" and a "presentation" and even though it took hundreds of hours of work to create the report I feel like I have been judged solely by the contents of my 14 minute presentation.  There is no way any student can present the entire contents of their thesis during 14 minutes.  There is no way the thesis faculty advisors will ever read our entire thesis reports.  There is just something discouraging about producing work that will likely never be read.

For me, I found that thesis is an exercise in stress management, not engineering.  I didn't learn anything about lighting design in the preparation of my thesis, it was simply time-constrained application of skills learned elsewhere in the AE curriculum.

Now that thesis is over I feel that the CPEP website is a good idea for documenting and preserving my thesis.  But through the year, I was very hesitant about sending people to my CPEP website because it was incomplete, and most people would not understand the process which we create and manage the CPEP.  Only in the last week have I sent the address to my family and professional contacts.  I never used the e-Studio Conference Room to seek advice, nor did I read a single message to see what advice other lighting students were seeking.  The CPEP is a great way for current peers and future thesis students to see what kind of work is expected in thesis.  It is unfortunately also a great way for current peers and future thesis students to "borrow" intellectual property.

Even though some of the above statements may sound negative, my overall attitude towards thesis is not.  I will be a better professional for having completed thesis.  The department has only good intentions in their application of thesis.  Thesis is something different for each individual student, and what I took from thesis may or may not be what the department had intended.

It doesn't really feel any different. Nothing seems to have changed. But it's over.

 

I will forever be in debt to two individuals for making my last few years as an Architectural Engineering student so special;

Dr. Richard Mistrick
For choosing to be a professor.  For conveying so much of his knowledge to me (and all of his students) in such a small amount of time.  For showing me it is OK to be genuinely excited about lighting.  For teaching me that lighting design needs to be approached as both a science and an art.  For being both critical and supportive of me.

Kathryn Trail
For always being there to bounce ideas off of.  For not making fun of me when I get hyper about a cool luminaire.  For making sure I didn't fail EE 425.  For being both critical and supportive of me.

Thanks to my thesis advisor, Dr. Martin Moeck, for coming to my presentation. Oh wait, he didn't come.

 

ABET Outcomes

for

AE 481W/482

Outcome not able to be assessed at this time

 

(Score of 0)

Level of ability demonstrated but below acceptable

 

(Score of 1)

Minimum acceptable level of ability demonstrated

 

(Score of 2)

More than minimum level of ability demonstrated

 

(Score of 3)

a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering

5

5

5

R

b. An ability to analyze and interpret data

5

5

5

R

c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs

5

5

5

R

e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

5

5

5

R

f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

5

5

R

5

g. An ability to communicate effectively

5

5

5

R

h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context

5

5

5

R

i. An ability to engage in life-long learning

5

5

R

5

j. A knowledge of contemporary issues

5

5

5

R

k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice

5

5

5

R

o. Engineering design capabilities in at least two (2) of the (3) basic curriculum areas of architectural engineering, and that design has been integrated across the breadth of the program

5

5

R

5

p. Communication and interaction with other design professionals in the execution of building projects

5

5

5

R

 

Please Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of this CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work-in-progress for this thesis project.  Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Benjamin Hagan.  Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed.  Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.

This page was last updated 04/20/2004
This page was created and is maintained by Benjamin Hagan

This page is hosted by the Department of Architectural Engineering at Penn State University.