ABET Assessment
ABET Outcomes
for
AE 481W/482 |
Outcome not able to be assessed
(Score of 0) |
Level of ability demonstrated but below acceptable
(Score of 1) |
Minimum acceptable level of ability demonstrated
(Score of 2) |
More than minimum level of ability demonstrated
(Score of 3) |
a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering |
|
|
|
x |
b. An ability to analyze and interpret data |
|
|
|
x |
c. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs |
|
|
x |
|
e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems |
|
|
|
x |
f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility |
|
|
|
x |
g. An ability to communicate effectively |
|
|
|
x |
h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context |
|
|
x |
|
i. An ability to engage in life-long learning |
|
|
|
x |
j. A knowledge of contemporary issues |
|
|
x |
|
k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice |
|
|
|
x |
o. Engineering design capabilities in at least two (2) of the (3) basic curriculum areas of architectural engineering, and that design has been integrated across the breadth of the program |
|
|
|
x |
p. Communication and interaction with other design professionals in the execution of building projects |
|
|
x |
|
AE 481W/482 Class Reflection
Thesis is a year-long program combination of two classes. During the Fall Semester, the teachnical reports provided a chance to understand the building project while at the same time utilizing our education from past courses. Spring Semester allowed us free reign to look deeper into the project, focusing on areas that provided interesting subject matter. Through the completion of this thesis, I had the opportunity to delve into a project, learning more about the industry and certain subject matters than in any other course.
CPEP Reflection
Each student was required to maintain a website containing all their work throughout the school year. This provided an consistent way to showcase work, while providing access to anyonre who was interested. The use of the Discussion Board was helpful in getting insight from industry members on certain questions that arose, mainly during the research part of thesis in the Spring Semester. |
|
