|
|
*Special thanks to Alexander Building Construction, Ewing Cole, and Geisinger Health Systems for providing me with the necessary tools to complete my Senior Capstone Project. |
|
Technical Assignments
Click on the any of the Images to see a viewable PDF of the Thechnical Assignment |
TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT #1 |
Technical Report #1 focuses in evaluating the conditions and background information concerning the construction of the Geisinger Gray's Woods Ambulatory care Campus. Here , I will explore more about the general project and building characteristics such as cost, schedule, delivery method, site conditions, building systems, and client information. Click on image to view report in PDF.
Initial Due Date: September 16, 2013
Revised Date: October 22, 2013
|
|
TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT #2
|
Technical Report #2 focuses on the key features affecting the execution of the Geisinger Gray's Woods Ambulatory Care Campus Phase II construction. Here, I will further analyze project schedule, detailed structural and MEP assemblies estimates, general conditions estimates, site layout planning, LEED evaluation and constructability challenges. Click on image to view report in PDF.
Initial Due Date: October 16, 2013
Revised Date: December 10, 2013
|
|
TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT #3 |
Technical Report #3 focuses on identifying areas in the Geisinger Grays Woods Ambulatory Care Campus project that are good candidates for research and further evaluation. Here, I will explore potential schedule acceleration scenarios, value engineering topics, and applications of critical industry issues on this project. Click on image to view report in PDF.
Initial Due Date: November 15, 2013
Revised Date: December 13, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
*Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work‐in‐progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Christopher Ankeny. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.”
This page was last updated on December 12, 2013 by George Andonie and is hosted by the AE Department © 2013-2014
|
|
|
